Welcome to the third entry of Postal History Sunday for 2023. PHS is hosted every week on the Genuine Faux Farm blog and the GFF Postal History blog.
Everyone is welcome here, regardless of the level of knowledge and
expertise you might have in postal history.
A few people have
been curious regarding the publishing schedule I maintain for these
weekly entries. Typically, I set each new effort to appear at 5:30 AM
Central US Time - on a Sunday, of course. So, if you want to bookmark
one of the blogs I linked above, you can just go directly there each
Sunday AM and expect to see that week's PHS after that time. For those
who prefer to be reminded that a new Postal History Sunday is available,
I tend to post something on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram at some point later each Sunday, depending on how my day is going. I also put a link in a comment on Richard Frajola's philatelists board.
If
anyone who reads these blogs feels motivated to share with others in
your own circles, you may feel free to do so - there are plenty of fuzzy
slippers and comfortable virtual chairs to go around.
A postal marking brings out a questionThe special Christmas Postal History Sunday
brought forward a question that I had not exactly considered
specifically. I had an answer almost immediately, but it had not been a
question I'd put much thought or time into prior to that point.
I
see postal markings as one part of the equation that makes up the story
around a given piece of mail. Yet, I have to admit that I do not
always consider things from the angle of marcophily (or marcophilately),
which is the study of the postmarks themselves. A person who
concentrates first on the markings for their sake might have felt these
questions were worthy of immediate and undivided attention. I, on the
other hand, filed them away as a point of some interest and moved on to
things like postal rates, ship sailings and an odd fascination that the
addressee lived on Drury Lane (do you know the muffin man?).
It's
all about each person's interests, experience and knowledge base. Each
individual may see something completely different to explore about any
given object!
Before we get to the question that was sent my
way, let's describe what I see when I read the cover shown above so we
can all start at the same place.
This
letter was mailed in Lynn, Massachusetts on November 2, 1863. The
postmaster at Lynn used hand stamps to apply two markings in red ink on
the front of the envelope. The first is a big, circular marking that
reads "Lynn, Mass, Nov 2, 24 Paid." These sorts of postal markings are
often referred to as a "CDS" or "City-Date Stamp," though I have also
heard people refer to it as a "Circular Date Stamp." Either way, it's
just like all sorts of names we use for things... not terribly creative,
but very blunt and useful as a descriptive tool. However, we can't
keep it that easy, we must shorten it to a TLA (Three Letter Acronym) so
we can confuse people who are new to the subject area!
I'm all for confusion with a dose of chaos, so CDS it is!
The
other marking was applied in the same red ink at the right. It's an
oblong marking with the word "PAID." The Lynn postmaster apparently
took their job seriously when it came to letting postal workers down the
line know that the 24 cents required to send a letter from the United
States to the United Kingdom was considered to be covered properly by
the 24 cent stamp that appears at the top right.
Every occupation
has their overachievers! I think you'll understand why I say that as
we get further into this Postal History Sunday.
The nearest exchange office was in Boston. An
exchange office
was a post office that had the facilities to prepare mail to be
"exchanged" with a foreign postal service. Boston was able to exchange
mail with London, England, according to the postal treaties in force
between the United States and the United Kingdom in 1863. So, not
surprisingly, this marking is known as an "exchange marking."
A US exchange marking for mail to the UK typically included
- the name of the exchange office (Boston),
- the date the letter was to depart (Nov 3),
- an amount of the postage that was due to the UK (19 cents),
- an indicator as to whether postage was paid in full or not (red color and the word paid), and
- an indicator as to the ship that carried it (Br Pkt).
That is one loaded marking!
But,
what I hope you will observe, in case you have not already, is that the
exchange office provided indicators to the foreign mail service that
this letter was paid in full. In fact, the foreign exchange office was
probably MORE, not less, conversant in all of the postage rates to
foreign destinations than a typical town postmaster might have been.
This
last marking tells us that the letter was taken out of the mail bag at
the London exchange office on November 16, 1863. They also include the
word "paid" in this exchange marking. So, when it was eventually
delivered to Mrs. Jewett at Drury Lane in London, the postal carrier
would know not to ask for anything more.
There is one additional marking on the back (or verso) of this
envelope that is a London post office marking. London W.C. tells us
that this went to the West Central postal district in London to be
prepared for delivery at the residence on Drury Lane. If you look at
the address panel, you will see that the sender of the letter also knew
this and helpfully provided "W.C." as part of the delivery address.
And now, the question...
I received an interesting inquiry from John B that read "I was surprised to see a PAID 24 handstamp from a town that
was not a maritime departure point for contract mails. Are
there other such towns?"
So, remember when I said I thought the postmaster at Lynn, Mass was
an overachiever? I was apparently not the only postal historian who
noted that they did things different from most everyone else!
So, let me take a moment to establish a baseline for you so you can understand what we're talking about here.
Shown above is a letter that was posted in Worcester, Mass on Dec 19,
1865. Worcester is located inland from Boston, whereas Lynn is
actually northeast of Boston and is situated on the Massachusetts Bay.
Still, both are relatively close to the exchange office.
Worcester,
Mass CDS (city date stamp) gives us the city and the date the item was
mailed (or was processed) at the Worcester post office. A black target
was part of this marking and its purpose was to deface the postage stamp
to be sure it couldn't be used a second time by persons with "nefarious
intent."
Ok. I've always wanted to include the word "nefarious"
in a Postal History Sunday. Now that I've achieved that goal, let's
move on.
The markings in red are exchange office markings (Boston
and London). The Worcester postal clerk apparently figured their black
postmark was sufficient and they left the rest of the work to the
exchange offices. No "24 Paid" or "Paid" in an oblong shape. No
special color - just black.
Here is a letter mailed from Lowell, Mass on July 19, 1864. Lowell
is inland and to the northwest of Boston. Once again, there are no
additional markings beyond the Lowell CDS and a black marking of
triangles to deface the stamp. The Lowell postmaster left the rest of
the job to the foreign mail clerks in Boston - just like the Worcester
clerk.
At this point, we'll cut to the chase and simply tell you
that this is the norm in the 1860s. Unless we are looking at a foreign
exchange office we do not typically see markings that illustrate the
postal rate (24 cents) or declare the item "paid" like we do with the
Lynn cover we started with.
An aside about marcophily
A
person who was intent on studying the postmarks probably would have
taken note of something with respect to the three Boston exchange
markings on the covers I have shared thus far. Actually, they might
note a few things. They might be interested in measurements (how big
are these markings) among other things. But, there is ONE difference
every single person who is reading this blog should be able notice.
I'll give you a hint. Look at the date in each of the three Boston exchange marks and I'll get back to you later!
What other towns had overachieving clerks/postmasters? 
It
just so happens that I do have another example in my own collection
from another town that illustrates this same zealous approach towards
marking the mail - even if the post office was not an exchange office.
Here
is a letter mailed at Providence, Rhode Island, that includes both a
circular "paid" marking and a nice red "24" to go along with the 24 cent
stamp at the right. Providence typically sent their mail to the New
York foreign mail exchange office - and we do see a nice red "N.York Br.
Pkt Paid 19" marking down and to the left from the postage stamp.
Over
the course of time, I have seen other examples with a similar set of
markings from Providence on several covers. I have also observed a
combination of similar markings on letters mailed in the 1860s (and
bearing a 24 cent stamp to the UK) from Lawrence and Springfield (both
in Massachusetts) and Jersey City (New Jersey).
Briefly, I
considered the fact that Lynn, Jersey City, and Providence could have
sent their mail via boat to the exchange office to be a clue. But,
Springfield and Lawrence are both inland, which breaks the proposed
pattern quickly and efficiently.
So, for the time being, until
I learn more, I will stand by my assessment that some postmasters were
intent on excelling at their jobs - or at least applying more postmarks
on their letters.
And that's about all I have for the reasons why.
Another marking pattern

A few questions from Gary D about this particular cover got me
started looking at a different postal marking pattern that I had
internalized and not really put into words. Gary was curious about the
fancy star cancellation on the postage stamp in combination with the RED
New Haven, Connecticut CDS.
Many people who enjoy collecting
stamps and postal history are attracted to some of the fancy
cancellations that postal clerks used in some towns during the 1860s
(and other decades). In fact, there are whole books cataloging fancy
cancellations during the mid to late 1800s. You can read about the book by Skinner and Eno here and see how you could access the original and an updated resource.
And yes, it is thanks to people who were very interested in marcophily that such resources exist.
Getting
back to the original point, I guess there was more than one way to
excel at the job! However New Haven's approach seems like a fair amount
of extra work because they used two ink colors. Red for the CDS and
black for the cancellation.
This seems to be a normal pattern for
New Haven when the mail was intended for a foreign destination across
the Atlantic Ocean.
Shown
above is a letter that was mailed from New Haven to Shanghai, China.
The pattern is the same - a red CDS and black ink for the cancellation
device. You might notice that this time around, the star has a hole in
the center. There are a number of other examples, including
this one to Prussia, that show similar black/red uses from New Haven.
As
I stated, it seems that the New Haven CDS is red when the letter was
meant to cross the Atlantic Ocean. I have seen letters with a three
cent stamp that show a black CDS to go with the black star cancellation
for destinations within the United States. Similarly, I noted a letter
to Aspinwall (Panama) where both the CDS and star cancellation were in
black ink. But, I will not make a claim that this is absolutely the
case - that might be job for a marcophilest!
To
add fuel to that particular fire, here is a letter mailed from
Pawtucket, Rhode Island, in 1867. Once again, the CDS is in red, but
the cancellation marking on the stamp is in black ink. I have a
suspicion that several towns followed a protocol where trans-Atlantic
letters acquired a red CDS, while the cancellation marking was applied
with black ink.
The question is this - what will I
do with that suspicion? The fields of postal history, marcophily, and
philately have pages upon pages of articles and resources. It is
possible (and even likely) that others that have explored this topic
already and I just have yet to discover their research and their
conclusions. So, we shall see where my own motivation ultimately takes
me.
For now, we will be content that the
subject area has plenty of room for continued growth and exploration.
More questions to ask. More answers to seek.
More to learn!
And
speaking of more to learn - did you figure out the difference between
the Boston exchange markings in our first three covers? Look at the
order of the month and date. The second cover puts the day before the
month, while the others put the month first.
I hope you enjoyed today's read. Have a wonderful remainder of your day and a fine week to come.