Welcome to this week's entry of Postal History Sunday. PHS is hosted every week on the Genuine Faux Farm blog and the GFF Postal History blog.
Everyone is welcome here, regardless of the level of knowledge and
expertise you might have in postal history.
Put on the fuzzy
slippers, find a comfy chair, pour some of your favorite beverage and
take a moment to put those troubles out of your mind for a few minutes.
Personally, I took advantage of the approaching snowstorm and left my
troubles in a spot where the snowdrifts are most likely to form. With
any luck, it will be a couple months before they are visible again.
Where did you think Guernsey Cattle came from?
If
you happen to be a person who has expertise or knowledge of a specific
skill or knowledge area, you might be familiar with a question that goes
something like this: "It looks/sounds/feels like all of these others, so what makes THIS one so special to you?"
This
can hold true for postal history, as it does for many other things.
For example, the envelope shown above just looks like another 1860s
cover from the United States to the United Kingdom. As a matter of
fact, it isn't even a very pretty example if I were to make that
judgement. It has a 24 cent stamp paying the proper postage for an item
that weighed no more than 1/2 ounce. There is a New York exchange marking, dated September 29 in red, that tells us it was properly paid. End of story. Right?
This
is where I encourage you to read the address carefully and I wait with
baited breath until you notice that this is sent to Guernsey. Then I
get disappointed when you say, "so what?" So, I take the easy way out and send you to a wikipedia page on Guernsey
in hopes that you get it. And you still look at me expectantly. I
mean, Guernsey is just one of the Channel Islands off of the Normandy
coast of France. What's the big deal?
There you have it. When a
person dives deeper and deeper into the details of some subject that
they love, they begin to see bigger differences in the details that seem
minuscule to others. But to those of us who do dive into these depths,
we see it as rewarding. It's a chance to uncover a story that is
different from so many other covers to the United Kingdom at this time.
For
the time being, I will simply say that one does not find letters from
the US to the Channel Islands very often from this time period. I will
also point out to you that Guernsey is NOT part of the United Kingdom -
at least not in the same way Scotland or Wales might be. Guernsey is a
sovereign state, though it is a Crown Dependency. They enjoyed the same
postage rate from the United States as England, Wales, Scotland and
Ireland despite a slightly different status. The island of Guernsey
even has a traditional local language (Guernesiais).
This
particular item is an introduction to this week's theme, "Splitting
Hairs," where I thought I'd share a few items and point to the thing (or
things) that make them stand out (at least to me) as different.
Le Havre for the win
So,
here is a folded letter from the United States to France in 1866. The
postage rate at the time was 15 cents per 1/4 ounce. This item must
have weighed between 1/4 and 1/2 ounce, so it required double the base
rate. The 24-cent stamp is combined with two 3-cent stamps to properly
pay the postage.
As far as examples of the double rate
in the 1860s to France go, this one seems pretty normal. It's properly
paid. It has all of the normal markings. It was mailed in Ballston,
New York and it went through the New York exchange office. There is a
"P.D." marking that shows the French also recognized this item as fully
paid. The letter took the Cunard Line's steamship Java to Queenstown (Cobh, Ireland) where it was offloaded and took the mail trains to London.
It's
all pretty normal until it came to crossing the English Channel to
France. Hmm.. it seems the English Channel has a great deal to do with
this week's Postal History Sunday.
The
hair splitting occurs with this French marking and the indication that
it entered France at Havre. The marking reads "Et Unis Serv Br Havre"
around the outside edge of the octagonal shape (United States, British
Service to Havre). This marking confirms that a British contract ship
(Cunard's Java) carried the letter and that the mailbag carrying the
letter was handled by the British Post.
Typically mail via
England to France would enter France at Calais if it came via the United
Kingdom. But, this letter is addressed to Havre and it was likely
carried across the English Channel on a private steamer, rather than the
normal contract steamer that carried mail to Calais.
Once again,
the vast majority of letters during this time period would not have
taken this route - but this one did. This makes it interesting to me as
it illustrates another option for mail carriage that came about because
getting mail from every point A to every point B is bound to have many
complexities.
We just don't see some of those complexities unless we really look for them.
A German state of mind
Our
next item of interest was mailed from the United States to Germany in
1865. The postage rate was 28 cents per 1/2 ounce and this letter
overpays that rate with thirty cents in postage. This is not terribly
surprising because the postage rate had been 30 cents prior to a rate
reduction to 28 cents for prepaid mail (the rate for unpaid mail
remained at 30 cents). Essentially someone either didn't know the rate
had changed or they misread the postage rate tables and saw the amount
for unpaid mail and used that.
At the time this item was
mailed, Germany was not a unified nation. Instead, it was a number of
separate governmental units that are collectively referred to as the
German States. At this time, the German States and Austria had a postal
agreement that allowed all members to treat mail between the
participants as if it was internal (domestic mail). This agreement is
often referred to as the German-Austrian Postal Union (GAPU) to
English-speaking philatelists or Deutsch-Österreichische Postverein
(DÖPV) to those who speak German.. If you would like to learn more about it, I can offer you a look at a similar agreement between Austria and some of the Italian States.
The
net result is that the postage rate from the US to members of GAPU was
the same (28 cents) with a few exceptions I might write about in the
future. Because of this, some postal historians are just as happy to
say this is a letter to Germany, just like THIS is also a letter to
Germany.
It
just so happens that many of the German States that were in GAPU
maintained their own postal systems, or they contracted with the house
of Thurn and Taxis.
So, in a very real way, each German State could be considered a
separate destination during this period in history. Most surviving mail
from the US in the 1860s to Germany would be to Prussia, Bavaria,
Baden, Wurttemberg, Hannover or even Saxony (as shown above).
Brunswick
just doesn't show up as often as the others do, which makes it
interesting to me. Still, regardless of how common or uncommon a
particular German State might have been as a letter destination, it is
the fact that these different states had their own postal services that
grabs my attention. This is why I split hairs and pay attention to
which German State a letter goes to in the 1860s, rather than simply
saying, "oh, this went to Germany." The finer distinction
reflects a reality of the world during that time period, where Germany
was split into many entities - but in the process of uniting into one.
Three hairs to split with one cover
Here
is a letter from the US to Italy. Like Germany, Italy was divided into
multiple states. But, by the time this letter arrived in 1866, only
the area around Rome was separate from the rest of Italy. The postage
rate for mail to Rome, sent via France, was 27 cents per 1/4 ounce.
This letter bears 27 cents in postage and was marked as having been paid
to its destination in Rome.
This particular letter has more than one detail that is a bit different than other, similar, letters.
First,
the letter was forwarded to a new location, Genzano, which was located
outside of Rome. If you look, you will notice that Rome was crossed out
and Genzano is written in different ink just below it. The number "15"
written in red ink towards the top of the envelope told the person
delivering the letter that they needed to collect an additional 15
centesimi to pay for mail carriage from Rome to Genzano.
Second,
if you look at the slip of white paper with the arrow on it, you might
recognize that this envelope was cut. This item was likely disinfected at Genzano in
response to the cholera epidemic at this time. It was pretty well
known that disinfection of the mail was not going to help prevent the
spread of cholera. But, some local governments wanted to be seen as
doing something (maybe anything) to protect the public.
And finally, this letter was carried by the Havre Line's Fulton.
If you'll recall, our second letter was special because it entered
France at Havre via a non-contract British Channel steamship. This
letter, however, was carried by a steamship company that crossed the
Atlantic from New York to Havre in France under contact with the United
States. This steamship line only carried 5.1% of the mail from the US
to Europe in 1866.
I suspect that's about as much "splitting
hairs" as some of you are interested in for one day. So, now that I've
made that point, let's provide you with some...
Bonus Material
Let's
return to our first item that was sent to Guernsey. Since Guernsey is
an island situated off of the Normandy coast (France), mail had to be
taken there by a steamship or sailing vessel. A route from Southampton
(England) to Guernsey and Jersey (also a Channel Island) was maintained
by the New South Western Steam Navigation Company until 1862 when an Act
of Parliament allowed the London and South Western Railway Company to
own and operate ships. The first ship built for their Channel Islands
route was the Normandy.
The Normandy was an iron
paddle wheel steamer that made its first voyage to the Channel Islands
on September 19, 1863. This letter would likely have been on one of Normandy's earliest trips, arriving in Guernsey on Oct 12, 1863.
The Normandy suffered damage in a collision with the liner Bavaria in April of 1864, but is best known for a catastrophic collision on March 17, 1870 with the SS Mary.
According to the account found in the Annual Register for 1870 (starting page 26), both ships were sailing in a dense fog and sighted each other too late to avoid collision. The Normandy,
broke into two pieces, with its lifeboat getting separated from the
crew and passengers. Two other boats were able to leave the Normandy successfully with thirty-one individuals. The captain of the Mary sent a boat under the command of his first mate to pick up survivors, but this boat turned back before reaching the Normandy, claiming to be unable to find the sinking ship in the fog.
Thirty-four individuals perished as the Normandy sank. Meanwhile, the Mary stood by to render assistance as long as they dared. But their own situation was doubtful because the Mary
had a sizable hole in the bow of the ship. The ship was lightened by
tossing a significant amount of its cargo (corn) overboard so it could
return to Southampton. Observers at Southampton marveled that the ship
survived long enough to get to the harbor safely.
The official inquiry that followed found the Normandy to be at fault, but also felt the first-mate of the Mary had "no valid reason" for returning to the Mary when he did without trying harder to find the sinking ship.
As for the mail that was on the Normandy
in 1870, it was lost - mostly. The lone exception was a single bag of
mail that was discovered floating on the water's surface. Those mails
were eventually delivered. And, no, my envelope was not one of those
pieces of mail since the one I illustrate is from 1863 and the sinking
of the Normandy was six and a half years later. But, finding an item from that floating mailbag would really be something, wouldn't it?
Thank you for joining me for this week's Postal History Sunday. Have a great remainder of your day and a fine week to come.