Welcome again (or maybe for the first time) to Postal History
Sunday! Take a moment of time to read about something different and
maybe learn something new. Stuff those worries in the cookie jar for a
little bit and make sure you take some cookies out to enjoy while you
read.
This week I am going to write about a topic that I often
find myself explaining to other postal historians who do not share my
specific area of interest. Now, before you think this will be 'too
much,' I can assure you that if you have read any of the other Postal History Sunday posts, this one won't get any more into the weeds than those. You're going to do just fine.
Now,
if you're worried because you ARE a postal historian and you think this
will be boring because it will be too simple... I guess that's your
call! But, I bet I can find something interesting for you before we
reach the end.
This week's "attention getter"
I'm
just going to put this envelope right at the top of the blog. For
those of you who are into postal history or philately, you probably
already have some level of appreciation for this item. And, if you
don't know anything about postal history, let me point out to you that
there are FIVE twenty-four cent stamps on this letter paying $1.20 in
postage.
The letter shown above was mailed in 1864 from
Champlain, NY, to Dundee, Scotland. The cost at the time was 24 cents
for a simple letter that weighed no more than 1/2 ounce. OR, if it
weighed more than a half ounce, the cost was 48 cents per ounce. So,
this letter must have had some weight to it.
But that's not the
big reason this envelope is interesting to me. You see, this letter did
not have enough postage to pay what was owed. The agreement between
the US and the United Kingdom was written in such a way that if
something was not fully prepaid, it was treated as if it was not paid at
all. As a result, the recipient had to pay the full postage due (6
shillings) and the $1.20 essentially became a gift to the US Post
Office.
How could that possibly happen? That's what today's Postal History Sunday is all about!
Sending a letter to England
This
next envelope was mailed in 1862 from Boston to London, England. This
was a simple letter, meaning it did not weigh more than the amount
allowed for the first increment of weight (1/2 ounce). As we would
expect, there is a single 24-cent stamp paying that postage.
Today, in the United States, it costs 63 cents to mail a letter that
weighs no more than one ounce in weight. It costs $1.45 to mail a
simple letter (a letter that weighs no more than one ounce) to Scotland
in today's mail. So, if you're thinking, "Wow. It sure
does seem like it cost a fair bit to send a letter to England in
1862." You would be correct.
In
fact, the letter rate actually decreased to 12 cents in 1868 and was
reduced further to six cents not long after. By the time we get to the
days of the General Postal Union (1875), that price was 5 cents!
To
make the point that postage rates declined rapidly after the 1860s, shown above is a simple letter that was mailed from Utica, New York, to
Huddersfield, England. The postage stamp covered the cost of postage -
two cents - in 1916.
As one of my college math professors was fond of saying.... "But, I digress...."
Getting back to the 1860s. The twenty-four cents of postage was split into three pieces:
- 5 cents was kept by the United States for their internal mail service
- 16 cents were paid to the sailing company that carried the letter across the Atlantic
- 3 cents were kept by the British for their internal mail service.
The
wild card here was that some sailing companies had contracts with the
British and some had contracts with the U.S. It actually mattered which
ship carried this letter because it determined which mail service got
16 cents worth of the postage so they could pay the shipping line.
The
US Post Office sold the stamp
for 24 cents to the customer, who put it on the envelope to show that
they had paid for the service. This letter went via a British packet
(steamship), which means the British needed 19 cents (16 + 3) to pay for
their part of the services needed to get the mail to the Reverend A.P.
Putnam in London. If you look at the Boston postal marking, you can see
"19 Paid" which recognized that 19 cents were to be passed on to the
British postal services.
What if it weighed more than a half ounce?
Well, 24 cents would not cover the cost of mailing that item - of course!
 |
remember, you can click on an image to see a larger version
|
Here
is a larger envelope that must have been more than a half ounce, but no
more than one ounce in weight. It was mailed from Chicago to
Shaftsbury, England. Two, 24-cent stamps were placed on the envelope
to pay 48 cents in postage. This letter was sent via a steamship that
had a contract with the United States, so only 6 cents was passed to the
British. If you look at the left side of the envelope, you can see a
red marking that reads "6 cents" with the word "cents" in an arc below
the number.
Below is a summary of the rate table for mail
from the US to the United Kingdom from 1849 through 1867.
You
might notice that the rate of postage was not 24 cents per 1/2 ounce.
It might be better to think of the 24 cent rate as a special rate for
very light mail. The actual rate might more accurately be said to be 48
cents per ounce.
But, wait a minute - did I say that the letter
above was mailed from Chicago? How did I know that? The clue lies with
that "6 cents" marking I was talking about earlier.
One
of the magic powers postal historians develop over time is the ability
to recognize certain markings and understand where they came from. The
"6 Cents" marking was used in Chicago to show that the British got 6
cents out of the 48 cents in postage. There is a similar, more commonly
found "3 Cents" marking used for letters that were a half-ounce or less
in weight.
Here
is an example of a simple letter that was mailed from Chicago. The
blue postmark at the top rigth reads "Chicago, Ills" and we can see a "3
cents" marking that looks a lot like the "6 cent" mark on the other
envelope. Shown below is another example blown up so you can see the
details.
Letters that went through the Chicago exchange office in the 1860s were typically sent to either Quebec or Portland, Maine so they could get aboard an Allan Line ship. The Allan Line had a contract to carry mail with the United States, so the British only got 3 cents and the United States kept 19 cents so they could use 16 cents to pay the cost of trans-Atlantic carriage.
But, what if they didn't pay enough?
People
didn't always get the postage right - so there had to be some sort of an
agreement to determine how "short paid" letters would be handled. For
example, the letter below (from 1867) has a single 24 cent stamp on it -
but it must have weighed more than a half ounce, so it needed 48 cents
in postage.
The
New York foreign mail exchange office placed a "Short Paid" marking on
the envelope and used black ink for their circular marking (the one that
has a "42" in it). The interesting thing is that this letter must have
caused the postmaster some trouble because there is a red marking just
to the right of it that indicated it was paid.
You can guess how
that might happen. The clerk was going through a pile of letters,
stamping them with the red paid marking and got into the rhythm of the
work. He hit this one with the handstamp and then said "hmmmmm." Weighed it out and
realized his instincts were correct - so he put the "short paid" and the
black circular marking on the envelope.
The
British Post Office agreed with this assessment and wrote the squiggle
on the envelope that is a 2 with a squiggly tail. This was their way of
saying the recipient owed 2 shillings for the privilege of receiving
this letter. The envelope contained a death announcement, which is
indicated by the black border. I have a suspicion most people would
have found a way to pay the 2 shillings in this case.
How much was 2 shillings in US money? 48 cents.
The
agreement between the United States and the British at this time was
that a letter that was not paid in full would be treated as COMPLETELY
UNPAID. Well, that's one way to make a death announcement sting a bit
more. The sender spent 24 cents to send it and the recipient had to pay
the equivalent of 48 cents to receive it. Ugh!
It could be worse!
The
letter below has 72 cents in postage applied to it AND the recipient
had to pay 4 shillings (equal to 96 cents) to receive it.
This
larger envelope must have weighed more than one ounce, so it would
require more postage. So, let's remind ourselves of the postal
agreement rates:
Oh...
yeah. It isn't 24 cents per 1/2 ounce - it's 48 cents per ounce once
you get to things heavier than a half ounce. But, that's not what
everyone understood when they mailed things. After all, if you wanted
to send a letter inside of the United States it was 3 cents for EVERY
1/2 ounce. It would be natural to expect a rate to a foreign country to
follow the same pattern - and that's what the sender of this envelope
expected when they put three 24-cent postage stamps on this large
envelope.
The letter must have weighed over one ounce and up to 1 1/2
ounces. They figured 72 cents was correct if you had 24 cents per 1/2
ounce. But, they were wrong - which means the letter was Short Paid.
Which means it is treated as UNpaid.
Ugh again!
Oh my goodness!
And all of that brings us back to our original item. If
you thought the prior letter recipient was being treated poorly, what about poor Mr. Robert Stiver of
Dundee, Scotland? He had to pay 6 shillings for this item sent in the
mail to him.
You
can guess what happened here. The sender expected that five 24 cent
stamps would pay for a letter that weighed no more than five 1/2 ounce
increments. In other words, the letter weighed over 2
ounces but not more than 2 1/2 ounces, so they figured it should require
5 times the 24 cent
rate per half ounce.
Sadly, the rate REALLY WAS 48 cents per
ounce, despite what the general public might think. The letter weighed more than 2 ounces and no more than three
ounces - so it needed $1.44 instead of the $1.20 affixed to the
envelope.
The
clerk in the New York exchange office, recognized that this was not
enough postage and they struck this letter (badly) with a "short paid"
marking to alert the receive exchange office in Scotland. Perhaps a
good way to think of this is to consider that the outside surfaces of a
mailed letter could be used so postal clerks could send messages to
their counterparts at future stops.
But, not every marking was
perfectly clear - just like some people's handwriting can be nearly
impossible to read. That's why there were regulations that included
directives for ink colors. The color red typically indicated that a
letter was prepaid and black would be an alert that postage would be
due.
The
New York exchange office marking was applied in black, which also told
clerks who would handle this letter later that it was NOT considered
paid, despite the postage stamps clearly visible on the envelope. It is
a bit difficult to read because it was placed over the Champlain, New
York postmark.
But, this leaves us with the issue of how much of
the postage goes to the United States and how much goes to the United
Kingdom! That's where this number comes in:
This
number was supplied by the New York exchange office and it represents
126 cents (or $1.26). In other words, the United States expected that,
once the letter was delivered in Scotland, the postal carrier would
collect six shillings (equal to $1.44). The British post would keep
only 18 cents (9 pence) and it would send the rest (5 shillings and 3
pence) to the United States.
From the United States Post Office's
perspective, they did pretty well with this letter. Someone had already
paid them for the $1.20 in postage stamps, but none of that postage
effectively paid for any services. Then, the US Post Office received an
additional $1.26 from the British to pay for the services the US
provided.
If you don't think that seems fair, consider how Mr.
Stiver must have felt when the postal carrier pointed at this marking on
the envelope:
That's squiggle represented 6 shillings due.
I sure hope the content of this envelope was worth every penny!
How or why could they do this?
It
would be tempting to leave you thinking that the postal services were
deliberately stealing money from postal patrons with this process. But,
that's not exactly what was going on here. Postal services around the
world were still trying to get people to move from a system where
postage was collected on delivery to one that had services prepaid by
the sender. One of the best ways to do this was to make people pay more
when they failed to prepay.
The prior system, where letters were
paid at delivery, opened the door for postal services to carry mail all
the way to their destination only to have the recipient decline to pay.
Of course, the letter would not be delivered in that case. But the
post had done all the work and gotten no compensation for it.
Relief!
We will close with a letter that was mailed from Boston to London in June of 1866. There are three
24-cent stamps paying 72 cents in postage. But, this letter has red
exchange markings and the word "Paid" shows prominently in the messages
mail clerks were sending to each other on the envelope.
If we
learned anything from all of the prior items I've shown, it was that an
odd number of 24-cent stamps (other than a single stamp) was going to
result in some unhappy recipients as they ended up paying the full
postage just to open the letter.
On April 1, 1866, the postal rate
from the US to the United Kingdom was altered so that it would be 24
cents PER 1/2 ounce. Suddenly, these odd multiples that the public
seemed to think should be allowed WERE allowed. It only took 17 years
(the treaty became effective in 1849), but some relief was granted to
those who were honestly trying to pay the postage yet fell prey to a bad
assumption.
The postage rate itself would decline to 12 cents per
1/2 ounce on January 1, 1868. So, these odd multiples of 24 cent
stamps that were accepted as paid are difficult to find. Once you put
this envelope together with the other items in this Postal History Sunday, it makes
a pretty good story.
Thanks
for joining me. I am hopeful that you
learned something new! Have a great remainder of the weekend and a good
week to come.
-----------
Postal History
Sunday is published each week at both the
Genuine Faux Farm blog and the
GFF Postal History blog. If you are interested in prior entries, you can view them, starting with the most recent, at
this location.