Monday, December 21, 2020

Winter Clothes

The grass on our farm is fading now that we've had many nights below freezing in a row.  It held off longer with a rather healthy green than it has for many years now.  We even had a hardy little dandelion open a flower under our oak trees in front of the farm house.

Yes, it is true that the leaves on the trees and bushes have been gone for a while now.  We don't really have anything growing in the high tunnel this year - a first for some time now.  So, the outdoor landscape was feeling a little barren to me in recent weeks.  

I don't like to critique Mother Nature - especially when the human residents on this planet often do a fine job of tearing up her artistry.  But, things were looking kind of blah - and I was letting that affect me a fair amount.  It really did not help that Saturday was about as gray and uninspiring as a day could get.  Well - that's how I felt - it doesn't matter if it was fair or not.

Tammy did help out a bit when she put some solar lights out on the bushes that reside in front of the solar panels.  They are new, so they were brighter than some of our older strings get.  It added a little bit of cheer late in the day - and it was kind of nice to see them when I got up in the middle of the night.

That's when I noticed that it looked like it might be foggy outside - or maybe my eyes were bleary from sleep.  It didn't matter, because my brain registered fog - and when there is fog this time of year, you get hoar frost!


Sure enough, Mother Nature had put on one of her finest pieces of clothing just for us at the Genuine Faux Farm - right at a time when she knew we could use a "pick me up."  

We got ourselves outside and decided to go to the Sweetwater Marsh, thinking it might be pretty fantastic there.  It was nice, but there wasn't much for hoar frost at our normal haunts.  Though, it was pretty neat to drive through a shower of frost falling from a tree that a light breeze is knocking from the branches.

So, we drove back to the farm - and realized we were getting the best show right at home.

The tricky thing about taking photos of hoar frost is that it always shows up better when the sun comes out.  But, the reality is that it has a different sort of beauty when the clouds still cover the sun.  And, it is even better when you can see the transition between sun and cloud cover.  

We found that we were motivated to work outside for a time - in large part because it had been so pleasant to walk around and enjoy the beauty of nature in the morning.  

We put another string of solar lights on another line of bushes.  

Maybe Mother Nature wanted us to show her something beautiful too?

Sunday, December 20, 2020

The Steamer that Didn't - Postal History Sunday

It is time, once again, to put on the comfortable shoes or slippers, get a warm beverage to enjoy (but keep it away from the paper collectibles and the keyboard!) and learn something different - and maybe - new!  It's Postal History Sunday on the Genuine Faux Farm blog.
 

Postal History Sundays started on the blog (in August 2020) when I took a moment and just shared some of what a person like me, who enjoys postal artifacts, likes to study.  I actually had two different ideas for today's post and I went with the one that felt the most fun to write at the time because this particular envelope, mailed in 1864 meets many of the criteria I shared in that first blog.

First of all - it's pretty clean and decent looking for something that is 156 years old - so that's a plus.  The markings are pretty clear and I can read each of them, which means I can piece the journey this letter took in the mail services.  And... it just so happens there is a story hidden within the details of this cover.  That makes it a winner in my book!

Mail from the United States to Prussia 1864

At the time this letter was written, Germany was a group of loosely connected states that were moving rapidly towards a more unified government in the 1860s.  As a postal historian, this holds a significance to me because there was more than one postal service to consider for mail being sent to various parts of what we would now identify as Germany.  That story is complex enough for multiple books on the subject, so I'll leave it at that for now.

Prussia negotiated a mail treaty with the United States in 1852 that arranged for mail to travel from the United States to Prussia via ships that would sail to Southampton (United Kingdom).  Mail would then be sent across the English Channel to Ostende, Belgium and run by rail to Aachen (Prussia).  The cost of mail sent via this agreement was initially 30 cents per half ounce of weight, but this was decreased to 28 cents by the time this letter was mailed.  

If you look carefully, there is a 24 cent stamp, a 3 cent stamp and a 1 cent stamp - effectively paying 28 cents in postage.

At the bottom left are the words: "via Prussian Closed Mail."  The whole idea of closed mail was that the mailbag this item rode in would NOT be opened once the United States sealed the bag until it arrived in Prussian territory.  Even though it saw time in the United Kingdom and Belgium, there will be no markings on this letter to tell us that.  We only know this is the case because that was the agreement between nations at the time.

Hey!  That's Too Long!

Someone in Waynesboro, Pennsylvania got this to the post office in time for the clerk there to mark the letter with an October 11 postmark.  The letter probably got to New York on October 12, which was too late to send the letter on the next sailing from Boston on October 12 - so they held on to it for the Saturday mail sailing from New York on October 15.  If only they could have seen the future - they would have mailed this letter just one day earlier!

The foreign mail clerk put the New York exchange marking with the October 15 date on the letter (in red) and put it in the mailbag - waiting until Saturday's departure.

And, now, we have a big gap in time before the letter is removed from the mailbag and it has a new marking put on it.

"Aachen 11 11 Franco" - red ink inside of a rectangle, top center of the envelope

This was put on the letter in the city of Aachen (Prussia), showing a date of November 11.  If you will recall "Franco" means Prussia recognized this item as "paid."

But - November 11?  That's almost a full month.  A normal time difference would be closer to two weeks.  What happened?

The Winds Did Blow

The ship leaving with the mails from New York that Saturday was the Saxonia, built in Scotland in 1857 and in service as a mail steamer for the Hamburg-American Line since 1858.  On its previous trip in August, it had crossed the Atlantic from New York to Southampton in eleven days.  In fact, most of its eastbound voyages took 11 or 12 days.  As they departed on the 15th of October, there was little reason to think this would be any different.

But, they didn't have radar and tropical storm forecasts in 1864.

At the time, Atlantic hurricanes were only recorded if there was landfall in a populated area or if there was ship damage to report when one was encountered at sea. Only five tropical storms were recorded in 1864, and one of them caught the Saxonia while at sea.

By the time a typical tropical storm gets to the northern sea lanes where ships like Saxonia sailed, it is probable that they would no longer be rated as a hurricane.  But, they still could cause significant damage.  


Image from: José Fernández-Partagás and Henry F. Diaz (1995a). A Reconstruction of Historical Tropical Cyclone Frequency in the Atlantic from Documentary and other Historical Sources 1851-1880 Part 1: 1851-1870. Boulder, Colorado: Climate Diagnostics Center, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Retrieved Dec 19, 2020.

The fifth recorded storm of the year was noted to be active from October 22 to October 24 and would have gone right into the path of the Saxonia, probably catching up to her as she steamed eastward.  The ship was damaged in the storm and limped into Southampton on December 10 and the Prussian Closed Mail bags were then taken across the English Channel by a channel steamer and to Ostende before getting to Aachen.

The passengers and mail bound for Hamburg were transferred to the Bavaria, another Hamburg-America Line steamship, arriving at Hamburg on November 11.  It would be interesting to find another postal artifact that went via Hamburg, rather than Aachen, but rode on the same ship!

And now you know how a 12 day voyage ended up taking 26 days to complete - another example of the things you can learn on a Postal History Sunday.

Thanks for joining me.  Have a great remainder of the weekend and a fine week.

Saturday, December 19, 2020

The Little Frog That Did

In yesterday's post, we celebrated a little flower that has been showing off some of its best clothing during the month of December - not a small feat for a flower, even if we did bring it inside.

Today, we get to talk about a stow-away who came for the ride as we brought our houseplants back in for the Winter.

We suspect the culprit is the tree frog shown in the picture above.  In fact, we talked about this frog in this post on September 18.  However, we really have no way of knowing for certain.  

Why?

Well, we know the frog is in the house because it chirps at us once in a while.  But, we have yet to identify exactly where it is keeping itself.  I think we have narrowed it down to a few spider plants and another fairly bushy plant.  But, in true frog fashion, it shuts up when we come over to investigate.

In fact, we DID locate two other tree frogs that had come in with the plants weeks ago.

Ideally, we would have liked to have transported the little thing outside (just as we did the others) before it got so cold so it could do what frogs do - find a place to hibernate.  But, now?  Well, it's inside for the duration I guess.  If it stays in the plants, there will be moisture when we water.  And, I suspect we bring in a little food with our plants.  We won't spray the plants to kill whatever invertebrates that may have ridden in with the plants.  So.... I guess we just enjoy it when the frog chirps at us and hope it can get enough to eat and drink while it's with us.


This has not been the first, nor will it be the last frog that will 'invade' our farmhouse.  Some might remember that we had Skip, the frog hanging out around our egg washing station in the basement in September of 2019

We might as well accept that we have a new housemate until the plants go back outside in the Spring.  I hope it stays happy and chirps at us on and off when ever it feels like being social.

Hmmm.  I wonder if we should give this frog a name?

Friday, December 18, 2020

The Little Flower That Could

It was very pleasant this year to have a solid back entry way to the farmhouse rather than the wobbly stair with the mildly difficult door.  In fact, we also had a small back deck that had enough space for us to put various potted plants, including some Gerbera Daisies and Gazinias.

The Gazinias did quite well out there and the Gerberas did 'well enough.'  They were a nice offset to the numerous houseplants we brought outside for the warmer months.


 As we brought houseplants in this Fall, we decided some of the annual flowers could make the trip as well.  Why not?  They're already in pots.  Maybe some fresh soil or fertilizer would encourage them to bloom for us when they are inside?

The experiment has had varied success, with many of the Gazinias failing (we suspect there has been some feline interference there).  But, a few of the Gerberas really liked the new soil and fertility.  

Sure enough, one of the flowers had a little bud at the base of the plant - so it came into my office so I could keep an eye on it.  By November 20, I had a full fledged bloom with more to come.  At present, the first bloom is fading - and that is sad.  But, there are three in full bloom and one more on the way.

That's a happy plant which, in turn, is making us happy.

Once again - a little thing like a flower lifts my spirits on a gloomy day and causes me to write a glowing review of its efforts.

What 'little thing' will you do today to help lift someone up?  Don't tell me.  Just do it - it's worth it.

Thursday, December 17, 2020

Irony and Other Cool Words


Irony

Back in March of 2009, we used the title "Irony" and my brain had some memory of it.  So, I hunted it up and you can feel free to take the link if you are curious.

At the point when I first wrote on this topic (in 2011), Tammy and I had one smallish television in the house.  We did not have satellite TV, we couldn't get cable, internet was too slow, and we didn't have a converter box.  In short, the TV was there to watch DVD's.  That's all there was to it.

So, what should appear in our mailbox?  A large envelope from the Nielsen Ratings.  Yes, they wanted our household to tell them what we watched on television.  We realize they use a random sampling technique, so we should be just as likely as anyone else to be asked our opinions.  But - if they only *knew*!

We were just going to toss the envelope, but for some reason I opened it.  What should fall out but two crisp one dollar bills.  Fresh from the printer (hmmmm).  They also included a SASE.  

So....why not?  But, how do we answer the "What are your three favorite TV shows?" question?  Or the one about our normal TV watching time?   What we probably should have done was select some of the long since terminated shows we have watched in the past, or maybe choose something we have on DVD.  Maybe I should have said "Sesame Street" or "Mister Roger's Neighborhood?"  You can't go wrong with those shows.

Fast forward to 2020 and we still do not have cable, we still don't feel we can afford the internet bandwidth to watch much online (that bandwidth goes to Zoom meetings now) - so we make do with 'air TV.'  The ten-year anniversary of our entry into the Nielsen Ratings is coming.  I expect my $2 soon.

Fortuitous

We haven't, according to my memory, focused on this word before - so you'll just have to deal without a link to another post!  And, if you are on limited internet time, that would be fortuitous for you.

Every year we work hard to figure out our field plans and our seed orders.  But, for some reason, we always seem to be ordering our seed in February, sometimes as late as March.  This can be a bit late if you want to order the bulk amounts of certain seeds that our farm requires.  As a result, we find ourselves looking for substitutes for varieties we would prefer.  Not the end of the world, but a bit of a pain.

So, this year (once again!), we are looking to get our seed orders in earlier.  Most of our seed catalogs begin arriving the week of Thanksgiving, just as they have most of the past fifteen or so years.  But, for some strange reason, I feel like this event just gets earlier and earlier every year.  I don't look forward to them as much as I used to either.

Even so, I am actually beginning to get anxious to begin our 2021 growing plan.  It would be fortuitous if the remaining seed catalogs we desired showed up on our doorstep.

Perspicacity
Now, here's a word I've always liked.  But, I can't always get my voice to say it without messing it up.  So, I'll type it instead!

Every so often, it seems like one or both of us pick up on things much quicker than normal.  In other words, we exhibit a higher perspicacity when that happens .  Recently, I have not been as quick on the uptick as I might normally be.  So, if I came across as a bit thick....sorry.  I got better (I hope).  At least I'm trying to refine my vocabulary....whatever that is.

Ostentatious
The word is, in itself, what it is.  So was that sentence.  But, other than enjoying writing big words in blogs, it is something neither Tammy nor myself wish to be.  But, because we run this farm business, write blogs, and work for organizations that need people to patronize them, we have to call attention to ourselves to make sales and promote what we do.  And we are finding there is a fine line between honorable self-promotion and being ostentatious.

Case in point #1 - at a 2011 winter farmers' market, we set up a tri-fold display with pictures and information about our CSA and our farm.  We both agreed that it was probably a good thing to do, but part of me wondered if it would not go over well with the other vendors who were there.  There is always a fine line to walk between attracting customers and belittling others who are also trying to attract customers.  And, if we go too far over the top with our own self-promotion, we wonder if they might conclude that we *are* ostentatious.

Case in point #2 - Facebook. 
In 2011 I wrote: "If that web application doesn't invite one to try to call attention to oneself, I don't know what does.   For those who only have a personal page and no business page, they might not be aware of the 'metrics' Facebook tries to use to indicate your 'success' at reaching people.  We continue to do our best to use Facebook as a communications tool, but we're not always sure it is the right tool.  On the other hand, so many people we are trying to reach seem to be using it right now, it is hard to ignore.  So, forgive us as we attempt to integrate Facebook into our farm communications system."
 
And now it is 2020.
And I still feel the same way - after years of using it (more or less) to try to encourage people to patronize our farm, view our blog and interact with us.  My conclusion?
We have never been ostentatious enough to succeed at social media.  And that's a fact!

We hope you had the perspicacity to enjoy this attempt at irony with respect to the ostentatious premise of this blog post.  We trust that its timing is fortuitous in that it will allow you to read it and....

Post your favorite big words as comments to this post!  Challenge us to try to use each word in a future (January) post.

-------------------------------

ed. note:  I found this little treasure from our blog posted on December 6, 2011.  I decided it could use an edit and a little extra... something (or three).  Enjoy.

Wednesday, December 16, 2020

Less Time to Do It All In

Here we are - December - and there is still plenty for us to do at the Genuine Faux Farm.  The issues this year are the normal ones (fewer hours of daylight and conditions are a little tougher to do outdoor work) and different than they have been (neither of us is a full-time farmer now).  Essentially, we have plenty to do and less time to do it all in.

One of the things has been pushed back is the high tunnel clean-up.  With the change in employment (among other things) we realized we had to cut back somewhere.  This time around, some of cuts came by NOT planting late fall and over-wintered crops.  The two of us regret not having some of the greens we would normally have this time of year - but given the reality that there are only so many hours in a day and only so much of us, we didn't have much of a choice.

And so - here we are - looking at getting the high tunnels cleaned up so we can get an early start with some crops next season.

The good news?  It can be pretty nice working in a high tunnel on a sunny, but chilly day!

Then, there are the projects that you intended to do earlier - back when the grass was turning green and the shoots of new plants were just beginning to show themselves.  At that moment in time there was so much we were going to accomplish!  Things like....  cleaning up some perennial flower beds and putting wood mulch in them.

So, we got to late November and there was still this pile of wood mulch in our driveway.  If we want to put the car in the garage, we've got to move that pile....  hm.  Glad we have a tractor with a bucket!  And, yes, we did get this one done - but we didn't put the wood mulch where we initially planned.  The bushes in front of the solar panels WILL appreciate the mulch, that is certain.  As far as the perennial beds?  There is always next season.

There are ALWAYS the fall clean-up tasks that come with a diversified vegetable operation.  One of these tasks is to take down all of the trellising that we use for various crops.  We have used the trellis structures you see above for various crops but really liked how they worked with our outdoor peas this year.  I think we'll do that one again.  The clean-up was much faster than the plastic fencing we used to use for peas - and this is much easier to re-use.


Rosie the tractor gets a fair amount of use this time of year, as do some of our "hayracks."  I use the quotes because they are used for nearly everything other than hay.

Throughout the course of a season, it feels like everything EXPLODES out from our various buildings as we put them to use.  Ladders go out to the orchard trees.  Irrigation header lines to various fields.  Pallets get used for all sorts of things here and there on the farm.  Then there are stakes, feeders, solar fence chargers and poultry netting.  I am sure there was something more on this particular load.

The Inspector approved of my efforts once I brought it in closer to the buildings for unloading. 

One of the few things that is happening right on time this year is the application of compost from our compost piles to some of the field areas.  The trick, for us, is to get to the task while the finished compost is still unfrozen, but when the fields won't get too ripped up by the traffic.

This year, we have been blessed with a fall and early winter that has not been wet (unlike the last three or so years).  That means we have had a bit more flexibility to spread the fertility where we want it.  This year, the area west of Valhalla got a nice dose of fertility!  We were also able to put some over the newly planted garlic.  

With temperatures dropping, we can't expect to be able to do this much longer.  But, if this is all I manage to move this season, I won't be too unhappy.

That's actually saying something when you have less time to do it all in.

Tuesday, December 15, 2020

New GE corn would be a disservice to farmers

The writing was on the wall. It had become clear to my partner Tammy and I that we would have to make some drastic changes if we wanted to continue to successfully raise quality fruits and vegetables on our farm. Changes in weather patterns combined with multiple pesticide drift incidents clearly required that we seek alternative growing strategies. 

Stepping away from our farm, we see that agriculture in the United States is reaching a tipping point. The writing is on the wall for an agricultural system that relies too much on pesticides. The efforts of Bayer/Monsanto to continue pushing new Genetically Engineered (GE) corn that is resistant to five different herbicides is counterproductive and discourages the change that must happen.

A simple answer: Change is hard

Why did it take our farm so long to begin to adapt when it was clear that we needed to do something?

Our farm has had its share of successful crops over the years. We use a wide range of techniques including complex rotations, cover crops, pollinator strips, cultivation, mulching, and intercropping. We like to think that we are willing to be innovative and, on the surface, that seems to be true. But, when it comes down to it, we resist change — even if we know it has to happen. When you would rather not change, it is not all that hard to find excuses to delay.

Change requires us to climb new learning curves and it can make us feel uncomfortable. We make mistakes as we adjust and we certainly reserve the right to be unhappy about being forced to adapt. We even feel a bit of resentment that the ‘old methods’ no longer provide the same rewards. 

But, that doesn’t alter the fact that we must move on rather than cling to past success.

Herbicide-resistant corn is not what farmers need now

Weed scientists are sounding the alarm that the current model for weed control will not be viable for much longer.  It is time to step off of the pesticide treadmill and move to farming systems that use diversified weed and pest control systems.

Unfortunately, Bayer/Monsanto's desire to push yet another product that promotes the old chemical-driven system only encourages farmers to wait, rather than be proactive and address the new realities in agriculture. Contrary to Monsanto’s claims, the new GE corn is not about giving farmers more choices, it is about capturing market shares and supporting large conglomerate farming operations rather than the skilled individuals and families who farm. Apparently, it is more important to continue selling herbicides for weed control than it is to encourage farming practices that are tailored to the needs of each farm. 

We all should have known better, because once there is a claim that there is a ‘silver bullet’ in farming, it only means the disadvantages are not readily apparent. Herbicides and GE seeds merely push the costs elsewhere. Pesticides have helped to build a farming culture that has forgotten that these are dangerous tools whose negative impacts are not confined to the applicator and the target crop. These tools are responsible for chemical trespass, genetic drift, human health concerns and environmental damage. They have limited and overshadowed alternative innovations in farming and diverted resources for research that could have resulted in effective alternatives.

And now, after several decades of chemical-intensive agriculture, farmers are about to pay some of those costs with painful transitions being forced on them by herbicide-resistant weeds.

It is time to move on

It is important that we recognize that most commodity crop farmers will need to make some difficult changes as the system that has dominated agriculture runs out of time. Many of the answers we need to make those changes are known, while others are being developed, and all of them require dedication, skill and resources to make them work.

This is not going to be easy for farmers. But, we can do them a favor by removing the temptation to delay their transition to other models. We can say ‘no’ to additional herbicide-resistant GE seeds.

The new GE corn and its resistance to five different herbicides is not what farmers or the rest of us need right now. This is why PAN, Friends of the Earth and the National Family Farm Coalition worked to collect over 33,000 signatures opposing the introduction of this new seed. We must make changes to our farming systems now, because waiting only makes things harder.

-------------------------------

Are you interested in seeing more content related to the Pesticide Action Network?  Take the link to the GroundTruth blog.   Your "favorite" farmer is featured there once a month on average.

Originally published on PAN's Ground Truth blog on July 13, 2020.

-------------------------------

 

 

Monday, December 14, 2020

We Can Work Together Using This One Weird Trick

And you thought I was done with my attempts to figure out how to do click-bait titles?  Think again.  Actually, I was told recently that I just don't have it in me to really do click-bait.  I'll take that as a compliment.

But, now that we've gotten past the preliminaries AND you've fallen prey to my fine example of click bait and come to read this blog - let's get down to the topic at hand!

The One Weird Trick is This

I have learned that click bait only works if you drag people through a whole bunch of screens and then never actually tell them what the one trick is.  Why?  Because by the time a person gets to the end, they've forgotten what the topic was.

Well - I'll get right to the point.  There ISN'T one weird trick to make us all work together.  

I lied.

Just to get you to come read my blog post.

Now I feel bad.

So I had better give you something more than that.

There is No "Trick"

There is just honest work to always do better and be better.  There must be a desire to engage in consistent and continual learning.  We all need an ear that patiently listens while we show empathy for those who are speaking.  We must have a willingness to admit when we don't know - or that we might be wrong.  There must be a heart that seeks cooperation and compassion over competition and self-satisfaction.  And we need to exercise our mind so that it engages in critical thought processes to examine what we think is true and how we came to that conclusion - and then allows us to re-assess it fairly when something new is brought to our attention.  We must put for the effort to discern whether the source is worthy of trust even or especially when we are inclined to agree.  And our tongue must speak without exaggeration and our mind needs to consider our words with care.  

And - we must put forth continuous effort that cycles us through failures and uncertainty, successes and enlightenment.

Chew on that for a while.  I know I have (and will continue to do so).

We take click-bait links or listen to sensationalized news or pass on the 'clever' social media meme because we want a trick that solves difficult problems with minimal effort on our part.  Or we take click-bait because we want the thrill of some ridiculous something or another.  Or we just want to remind ourselves how superior we are to everyone else.  Or we are idly curious - and we want something to sneer at or be surprised by.

We take click-bait because we want to skip to the end of the book.  Jump to the end-game.  Know what to think about everything - all the time - right away.  We take click bait because it is easy - and it is addictive - and it excites us in all of the wrong ways.

Not here and not today.  Today we work together by using this one weird trick:

We admit that it won't be easy and we do it anyway - the hard way.

Sunday, December 13, 2020

Wrong Solution - Postal History Sunday

Welcome to Postal History Sunday, the blog post where we encourage you to learn something new and allow Rob to share a hobby he very much enjoys with you. Put on the fluffy slippers and pet Fluffy the cat!  Get a hot chocolate or some hot tea, but keep it away from the paper collectibles (and your keyboard)!  And, let's see where today's post takes us.

-----------------------------------

It is likely that most people who read this blog may recall the anthrax poisonings in 2001 that were a result of letters mailed via the postal system to targeted individuals or groups.  One of the responses at the time was for the postal service to begin irradiation of the mail in an effort to kill the anthrax spores.  That irradiation process often changed the paper, darkening it and making it more brittle - and plastics were often impacted significantly.  

I recall this because stamp and postal history collectors were very concerned about mailing items to and from each other - most opting to use other courier services.  Why?  Well, we collect paper items that we don't want damaged and we usually ship them in mylar sleeves.  Not a good combination for irradiated mail!

Killing Germs in the Mail - 1800s Style

In true form for me - I told you that story so I could tell you about this one!

The envelope shown below has two slits cut into the envelope.  These same slits also cut into the enclosed letter.  You can see the slits by looking for the white paper I placed through the holes so they are more easily visible.


A fairly common practice in the first half of the 1800s was something postal historians refer to as "disinfected mail."  Incoming letters that may have traveled from or through areas that were identified as "unhealthy" or were in mailbags on a ship that was identified as carrying a disease were often (but not always) put through a process to prevent the mail from carrying that disease any further.  Sometimes, a post office would simply just put ALL of its incoming mail through a disinfection process.

Each piece of mail was punctured, slit or cut in some fashion to allow either a fumigant or a vinegar mixture to access the interior of the item.  Where larger volumes of mail were involved, tools were developed to aid in the processing prior to disinfection.

For example, the paddle shown above (collection of the Smithsonian Postal Museum) was used in the United States to open up mail for fumigation with burning sulfur.  I am sure it was not enjoyable to receive a letter punched full of holes and smelling of sulfur, but that was the price people paid for the sense that something was being done to control the spread of disease.   

Some of the first examples of disinfected mail can be traced back to the 1400s when the Republics of Venice and Ragusa "perfumed" the mail from the Levant (we would now call it the Middle East) with sweet smelling herbs and flowers.  But, by the time we reach the 1850s and 1860s the practice of mail disinfection was in decline, but not unheard of.

Enter Cholera

As trade and travel increased between Europe and India, the opportunity for the spread of cholera increased.  What people did not fully understand until 1885 was that cholera spread occurred when a person ingested something that was contaminated with the feces of an infected individual.  However, contaminated water was, in fact, identified as the likely culprit in 1855 by a British physician (John Snow), but the debate raged on for a time after that.  

It turns out, the best solution would have been to secure clean water sources, provide sanitation services, and maintain food safety procedures of some kind.  And, in fact, improvements in clean water and sanitary systems in subsequent years would help much of Europe to better handle later pandemics as the century progressed.

As is often the case, a good preliminary solution was likely going to be quarantine and travel restriction.  But, that is rarely popular - especially when it was bad for business.  So, some locations returned to the disinfection of mail to show that something (even if it was deemed to be likely to be ineffective) was being done.

The item above was mailed in September of 1855 from Milan to Parma (Italy).  The Third Cholera Pandemic (1852-1860) was just coming off its peak and the nearby city of Ferrara (east of Parma) still provides data for scientists to analyze today.  Clearly, the spread of cholera was on the minds of the people in this region - and for good reason. 

If you look carefully, you can find two disinfection slits that look very much like a person pushed a blade downwards from top to bottom of the letter to allow the fumigant to enter the sealed folded letter.  Because there is no staining, it is unlikely a liquid solution was used on this item.

The folded letter shown above initially got my attention because of the red marking that reads "Dopo la partenza," which means "after departure."  It actually made its way into a blog post about markings that showed an item was too late for the mails that were leaving that day.  The disinfection slits were just icing on the cake for me!  It's always good to have more than one point of interest.


The last item was mailed from the United States to Rome in 1866, during the Fourth Cholera Pandemic (1863-75). 

This time only a single slit can be found in the envelope, though a second one could have been on the left hand side.  We will never know because the left hand side has been reduced - probably to get rid of a ragged and damaged edge on the envelope.  Initially mailed to Rome, this item was forwarded to Genzano (SE of Rome) where 15 centesimi were due for the forwarding service - see the red 15?   It is likely that the fumigation occurred at Genzano since there are not records indicating that Rome, itself, was disinfecting mail at this time.

And Now You Know

And now you know a little better why I enjoy postal history.  It opens up a window... or a door... to the story that surrounds each item.  Sometimes the story it tells leads to events of global consequence - such as the Cholera Pandemics.  Other times, they just tell a personal story for a person who lived a life just like ours.

I wonder what story we'll explore next week?

Friday, December 11, 2020

Feedback Friday

It has been a long time since we have specifically written a blog post asking for feedback from those who read what is written here.  So I'll start with the request.

If you have a specific idea you want me to pursue or topic you want me to cover - ask a question or make a suggestion!  And we'll go from there.

Also, if there has been something specific you have enjoyed in this blog - it doesn't matter what it was or how you frame it - give us a quick response in comments if you are able to do so.  Otherwise, other communication methods are fine!  If there is something you would like to see more of... don't worry about 'less of' something - you can control that by encouraging more of what you like! 


 Why am I asking?

The selfish reason?  Well, I may be a 'quiet person' but I do still need some interaction with others.  The isolation that comes from trying to keep others safe and prevent our health care workers from being overwhelmed impacts us all in one way or another.  And, yes, I appreciate periodic validation that what I am doing is worthwhile for someone other than myself.

But, as is usually the case, those reasons aren't enough for me to actually act on them.

The rest of the reason?  We still have some difficult weeks and months ahead where we need to continue to do things differently than we wish - simply because we care for each other.  I intend to continue to offer the gift of very regular blogs through the winter months.  It is my offering to you because it is something I CAN do that just might make a small difference in the lives of some few other people (and maybe a cat or two... though they don't like it when you catch them reading).

I could use a little help with topics, questions to answer, and ideas.  So, while I very rarely push for response from people when I ask for feedback - I'd really like some now to add fuel so I can keep this fire going.

Background to help you help me

A couple of years ago, I had the opportunity to talk to one of Dr. Wen's classes at UNI.  As a result of that conversation, they sent questions to me that I ended up answering in the form of blogs.  Actually - it led to five of them - of which this is the first.  I enjoyed that process very much and I think some of them liked the chance to ask directly and be answered!  

I've also had people ask questions of the critters on the farm.  Someone wanted to know what the roles of the Outdoor Farm Supervisors (cats) were and it led to this post (among others).  And, the Inspector will still answer questions - as long as I skritch him.  So, ask Inspector.  Ask Soup.  Ask Bree or Hobnob.  Ask the hens!  Ask Stu the rooster.  Ask Crazy Maurice, the weeping willow (though he is a little sleepy now).  You can even try to ask the turkeys.... but they won't answer for a while.

What's Been on the Blog Recently

I try to keep some variety on the blog because not everyone likes the same thing.. including me.  And, frankly, some are harder to write than others.  And, crazily enough, what is hard to write and what is easy actually changes from week to week.  I guess I'm moody or something.

In the past two plus months (Oct - Dec) we have had the following distribution of content:

  • Genuine Faux Farm related material - 20 posts
  • More philosophically inclined  - 13 posts
  • Nature related - 11 posts
  • Postal History Sunday - 9 posts
  • Animals & Maurice - 9 posts
  • A bit of humor - 7 posts
  • "Revived" older posts from the blog - 6 posts
  • Current event related - 5 posts
  • GFF Stories - 4 posts
  • Various entertainment (music, books, etc) - 4 posts
  • Pesticide Action Network posts - 4 posts
  • Local Food - 2 posts
  • Veggie varieties or types - 2 posts
  • Organic ag - 2 posts
  • Weather - 1 post (can you believe that?!?)

So, Let's Hear You!

Ask a question of me.  Ask a question of one of the denizens at the Genuine Faux Farm.  Tell us what one of your favorite posts have been over the past year (or from whenever!) and if you'd like more of 'that.'  If you like the Postal History Sunday series, ask a question about that.  Want hints on growing a veggie?  Curious about what Rob thinks about ag policies in the state or nation?  Have questions about the number of fingers Rob has?

Be well!

Rob

Thursday, December 10, 2020

Meteor Shower Deleted!

I sometimes wish I was quicker with pulling out my notepad and pen when amusing things get said or done around the farm.  Given the right mood, the two of us have the ability to take discussions in all sorts of absurdly wonderful directions and I sometimes wish I could remember them well enough to report them and then play with them further on the blog.  After all, if they amused us, won't they amuse you? (ok - don't answer that one - you don't want to hurt our feelings do you?)

Why don't I remember them, you might ask?  

Well, if you fall into a giggle fit, your brains fall right out of your ears and you have a case of temporary amnesia. 

However, I do remember one specific conversation that started with the observation that we could see the stars.  This discussion was particularly noteworthy because it had been very cloudy for some time AND it was forecast to continue to be cloudy.  To top it off, temperatures were forecast to be higher than usual in mid-December.  Sadly, the sun was not forecast to show itself during the daytime hours and the couple of moments we were going to get of clear skies was 9:00 at night - the very moment we were having this discussion.  Not helpful when you were hoping for some sunshine to do outdoor tasks.  

After the expected and understandable lament that we would have liked a few moments of sun versus the continual fog, drizzle and overcast/cloudy skies during the day, Tammy mentioned the fact that there was supposed to be a meteor shower at some point during this week.  But...

She DELETED it.

Ooops, you missed one.

This is one of those cases where I know Tammy heard what she was saying.  She just wanted to get to the point sooner without all of the connections that get a person from point A to point B.  I mean, I DID understand that she was referencing an email she deleted that had the INFORMATION about the meteor shower.

But, WHY would you want to let something like that go?  I mean, she just said "There's supposed to be a meteor shower at some point this week, but I deleted it."

We didn't let it go - we had fun with it.

So, for everyone out there who was hoping to see a meteor shower recently.  You didn't see it because Tammy DELETED the meteor shower.  It had nothing to do with incessant cloud cover.  So there!

Rob was particularly disappointed because he felt it was about time to take a shower.  So, if the next time you see him and you feel that he is stinking up the place - blame Tammy.  She deleted the shower he was going to take.
 

I don't care if she deleted it, take a shower anyway!  I, the Sandman, have spoken.


For those who have interest in things like meteor showers, Tammy gets email posts from the Space Weather site.   But, remember, don't delete emails about meteor showers, that will make Rob stinky.

----------------------------- 

ed note: this post is an edited version of a blog that was originally posted on Dec 15, 2014 - it was worth a new look and a little extra sauce - enjoy!

 

Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Even More Music I Am Glad I Didn't Miss

Each month since I put out this post in October, I have created a new playlist and looked for a few albums that make me think - "Wow, I am glad I didn't miss that album!"  This is my December installment.  Who knows if I'll maintain the energy and interest to keep this up?  There certainly is plenty of music to highlight - so that won't be an issue!

Future of Forestry - Union

There is cello.  There is piano.  There are gorgeous melodies and counter-melodies.  It is simply difficult for me to explain how much we like Union by Future of Forestry.   

But, perhaps I can actually manage it.  Tammy and I both played cello, so we have an appreciation for music that uses that instrument well.  If anything would make me try to take up the instrument again - it would be the opportunity to play these melodies.  It is almost as if Eric Owyoung pulled some of these sounds and phrases that have been flitting around in my head - wanting to be played - and put them into his own compositions.  But, I had never found a way to convert them from my head to the cello myself.  He has done so, and they are as good or better than I imagined them to be. 

Peter Case - Peter Case 

Here is an album that I have to give my good friend Phil much credit for identifying and bringing to my attention.  At the time this came out, I was more inclined to listen to bands with more instrumentation than I was to singer/songwriters.  Sure, I appreciated them and I knew quality when I heard it - but I was more interested in exploring other sounds.  So, Phil planted a seed with Peter Case's self-titled album that did not really bear fruit until some years later.

The time finally came when it became easier for me to make my own playlists with the event of the iPod.  Suddenly, I could sneak these excellent musical stories into practically every list I created and my appreciation for them grew.  This man knows how to paint a picture with his lyrics, voice and guitar.

 LSU - The Grape Prophet

Sometimes I recognize an album as one I am glad I didn't miss it because it expanded my horizons and the Grape Prophet is a great example.  Some people call this a concept album and others call it a rock opera.  Either way, it follows a story from start to finish.  But, like rhetorical juggling, it isn't required that you catch everything that was flying in the air during the journey.

Simply put, this album caught my interest and it was a regular start-to-finish play as I commuted to and from work in Madison, Wisconsin.  There were puzzles (what did he mean by that?) and interesting textures in the music (how did they make it sound like that?) and it all hung together.  It's hard for me to put any of it into playlists because my brain has committed the order to memory.  But, I don't consider that to be at all bad.

Lone Justice - Shelter

I guess there were critics who weren't terribly happy with Shelter - perhaps because Lone Justice did not follow the trajectory they foresaw after their first album.  I wouldn't know and it really doesn't matter to me because I was introduced to Lone Justice with this album.  I enjoy the experimentation of sounds and how they mix with Maria McKee's voice.  

The truth of the matter is this - I was initially drawn to the album by the radio ready "I Found Love" and I came away with an appreciation for a style of vocal and music that I hadn't had before.  This is another album that has gained more appreciation over time because I can easily make playlists.  Start at the ends (I Found Love and Dixie Storms) and work your way in - I think you will find something to like here as well.

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

Living a Dicamba Nightmare

 

Most farmers have a particular crop that they would identify as their favorite, and I enjoy growing sweet and bell peppers.  A healthy pepper plant shows glossy green leaves on a compact plant, making it relatively easy to cultivate and harvest.  I love the way they look, and it’s rewarding to fill harvest containers with mature fruit that will find homes with our customers.  In the winter months I dream of the neat rows of plants loaded with fruit.

Unfortunately I have lived a nightmare in recent years.  Pepper plants do not react favorably to dicamba herbicides, and our farm has been finding it increasingly difficult to grow one of my favorite crops as dicamba drift from nearby soybean fields inhibits their growth.  

Discouraging news

In late October, Administrator Andrew Wheeler announced that the Environmental Protection Agency had approved the registration of dicamba products Xtendimax Vaporgrip Xtra, Engenia, and Tavium for over-the-top applications on soybeans and cotton for the next five years “to provide certainty to growers.”  This new registration places further restrictions on the application window for this herbicide, including a seasonal end-date of June 30 for soybeans and July 30 for cotton.

Both BASF and Bayer have made claims that they are addressing dicamba drift by introducing new additives to their products that will “reduce the size of air bubbles” in their products.  It is partially on the strength of these claims that new formulations will prevent drift that EPA gave approval for re-registration.  While these additives and restrictions may reduce drift during the application process, they do not address dicamba’s volatilization issue.

Not surprising - Dicamba damages non-target crops

The biggest issue with dicamba products is that they volatilize (become a vapor) after application and then drift to fields that are not populated with dicamba tolerant crops.  A farmer could apply these products, following best practices to avoid immediate drift, and still be guilty of applying a chemical that can move off-target two, three and even four days after spraying.

The science has been clear for a long time.  The factors that increase the likelihood of dicamba drift include higher temperatures, lower relative humidity, no rainfall in the subsequent days after application and increased evaporation surfaces provided by the leaves of the target crops.  Volatilization has occured in Iowa's corn during years when wet fields prevent early use and applications get moved back into late May and June.  The spray application period for soybeans routinely falls into this window where there is an increased likelihood for volatility.

Disturbing trend

The EPA first approved dicamba products for over-the-top applications in soybeans and cotton in 2016, giving it a conditional two year registration.  That registration was renewed with some additional restrictions in 2018.  But, what many people may not realize is that dicamba products have been applied regularly to other crops, such as corn, for years.  

The USGS National Pesticide Synthesis Project shows the rapid increase of dicamba use after the first registration period.  USDA data shows that, in the Midwest region, one quarter (25.4%) of the soybean acres were treated with dicamba in 2018 as compared to 12.6% in 2017 and 6.3% in 2016.  Unofficial reports indicate that use in recent years has continued to increase.

(note: the chart above can be found at the USGS link shown in the prior paragraph.  The chart was viewed on the USGS website on Dec 4, 2020 and rendered here as shown there.  The chart does not yet show 2018 numbers, but you could expect it will show both green (soybeans) and red (cotton) to be at least double the amount shown for 2017.)

This past growing season provided more evidence that dicamba products are not suitable for over-the-top application.  The state of Iowa reported a record number of dicamba-related drift complaints, and weed scientist Bob Hartzler noted that damage was worse than prior years, showing plant injury on a “landscape level” throughout the state. Meanwhile, similar reporting trends appeared in Minnesota and evidence in Tennessee suggested that dicamba isn’t the solution for Palmer Amaranth (a glyphosate resistant weed) that it was hoped to be.

False Hope?

When the EPA allowed for the conditional registration in 2016, growers of crops without dicamba resistant genetic traits braced themselves for what was to come.  After all, it was not as if there wasn’t already a track record that foretold future problems. As early as 2018, leading schools of agriculture were recommending that dicamba technologies be applied as a pre-emergent application rather than an over-the-top spray.  Additionally, the Bader Farms lawsuit revealed that Monsanto was fully aware that the product would cause problems even before they applied for dicamba’s first provisional registration.  

I will admit that I was among those who allowed myself a little bit of hope once the 2020 9th Circuit US Court of Appeals ruling was released ordering a suspension against the conditional registration of dicamba. The circuit court opinion cited “enormous and unprecedented damage” caused by dicamba products in the past few years.  

Unfortunately, the EPA did not immediately enforce the 2020 circuit court ruling, extending the allowed application of dicamba products until July 31, effectively allowing post-emergent applications to continue as planned.  And now, we have the nightmare of five more years of dicamba to look forward to.

Good luck with the peppers?

Here I am, in Iowa, and I am dreading another five years where I will experience chemical trespass in the form of dicamba drift.

A typical season's yield for bell pepper production on our farm between 2012 to 2015 was 750 to 850 pounds of marketable fruit.  Contrast this to our field production for bell peppers in 2017 (30 pounds), 2018 (5 pounds) and 2019 (51 pounds).  And, to be perfectly clear, our standards for counting a fruit as marketable decreased greatly during those three seasons.  Field peppers showed the classic symptoms of growth inhibitor damage each year, typically beginning in the second half of June to early July.

Our response has been to reduce our pepper production and squeeze it into our limited high tunnel space, where the covered environment seems to protect these plants from volatilization drift.  But there’s a bigger problem we are battling - peppers are not the only crop showing damage.  We can’t cover everything.

When I signed up to be a farmer, I was perfectly willing to make adjustments to address weather, climate, pests, weeds and even consumer demand.  I did not sign up to spend my time and energy trying to protect my farm and my crops from chemical trespass.

It is clear to me that this decision is about protecting the market share of chemical companies and their corresponding genetically enhanced seed stock rather than providing farmers with choices for the tools they use to grow their crops. Farmers who might want to select a different seed product and those who might want to pursue alternative crops or alternative cropping systems are simply left to wonder how much damage they must expect in the coming months to their fields.

Apparently, I can expect that I won’t get to grow my peppers.

-------------------------------

Are you interested in seeing more content related to the Pesticide Action Network?  Take the link to the GroundTruth blog.   Your "favorite" farmer is featured there once a month on average.

Originally published on PAN's Ground Truth Blog on December 3, 2020

-----------

Monday, December 7, 2020

Why Certified Organic?

I was recently honored by a request from the Iowa Organic Association to be part of a farmer panel during their virtual Annual Meeting on Deember 1st.  I was able to join my good friend, Andy Dunham (Grinnell Heritage Farm and Tallgrass Prairie), and two other people I respect - Kathleen Delate of ISU and Nelson Smith of Springtown Ranch near Brighton.

Each of us was asked to speak for fifteen minutes, covering everything from a bit about what we do and how the year has impacted us to discussing why and how we "do organic farming."  If you wish to view the whole meeting, you can go to this link.  The nice thing about this recording is that you can look at the timeline and see that it is segmented to allow you to jump to different parts of the presentation.  If you want to skip some of the business side of the meeting, you can - for example.  It's recorded and available - your choice!  Isn't that nice?

I felt compelled to talk about the good reasons WHY I feel it is important for our farm (and other farms) to grow crops with organic practices.  And I realized - hey!  I have a farm blog!  We can use it to say more if we want!

This is a typical view of vegetable crops in one of our high tunnels (Eden in this case) for any given year at the Genuine Faux Farm.  If you look carefully, you can see tomatoes, peppers, green beans, carrots, beets, onions, melons and maybe even the stubble of lettuce that has been harvested.  There are even some flowers interspersed that are not readily apparent from the photo.

A significant part of the concept of organic agriculture is the idea that a healthy natural system is one that maintains a diversity of organisms.  That is why importance is placed on crop rotations, integrated pest management, and natural areas.  

Let's be honest now.  Not every certified organic operation is as committed as every other operation in its pursuit of diversity.  And, our farm is, in fact, probably more willing than many to accept the extra labor costs and potential losses that come with diversity at such a fine level.  Part of this is our own personal choices and preferences.  

And the rest has always had to do with our desire to try to find ways that we can achieve diversity without forsaking too much efficiency.  We figured that we were willing to give up some of our bottom line in the hopes that we would find ways that would translate to other farms without hurting THEIR bottom line.  Sometimes, I think we made a difference or two.  Other times, I am not so sure. 

I do know that we have made (and will continue to make) a valiant effort.  And I am still convinced that diversity is a key to a healthy farm.

This is one of my absolute favorite farm pictures.  I try to tell people that a successful field for a farmer is one they want to spend time in.

That is a successful field.

Ok, yes.  If you are a row crop farmer or a veggie farmer that has more land than we do, it might seem small.  The overall space is about eight thousand square feet.  The area is dedicated to melon/watermelon production as our cash crops and the amount of space taken is consistent with the years prior to the one shown above (I think it was 2015).

We decided to intentionally reduce the number of melon plants put into the field space by 30% and use that space for more pollinator support plants.  There are zinnia at the left and borage on the right.  Not easily seen in the picture is buckwheat, sunn hemp, basil, calendula and... of course, more melons.

It looked great.  There were all sorts of bees, toads, frogs and other useful critters.  It felt great to go out there.  I was proud of that field and how it looked.  

And I expected to harvest about 1/3 fewer melons because we had that many fewer plants.

Instead.  I harvest 30% MORE melons.  Nature wins.  Again.

Certified organic farms are encouraged to work with nature instead of in opposition to natural processes.  We humans are sadly mistaken when we think we are able to do better in spite of nature.   That moment when we think we are doing so is the one where we need to look carefully at where the hidden costs might be.

Once again - does every certified organic grower push this hard to support natural processes?  Of course not.  But, the culture of organic production encourages cooperation with nature and the services it provides (such as pollination services).

For those of you who are not familiar with the organic certification process.  Each year, we are required to develop an organic system plan for our operation.  That plan may be very similar to prior years, but we should review what we are doing each and every season and make adjustments.  That plan is then viewed by an organic certifying agency (in our case it is IDALS - Iowa Dept of Ag and Land Stewardship).  They will compare our plan with organic standards and highlight any possible problems in that plant.

Once that plan is approved, an on-site inspection is scheduled.  And if you pass the inspection (or address any issues that arise as a result), you can achieve certification for the year.

The process supports a positive system for critical evaluation of how you go about growing.  You have a structured opportunity to think about what you are doing and why.  You are then forced to articulate it in some fashion to someone else who can give you feedback.  

Please note - organic certification agencies WANT organic operations to succeed in achieving certification.  This does not have to be an adversarial situation!  Pure and simple - it is a fantastic opportunity to learn and refine your own processes with some built in resources for feedback.  I have found that if I want more from the certification process - I can get it.  And on years when I just don't have the energy to get more from it, well - we do what we must to earn certification and then find ways to improve the next time.

I have heard it said many times that record keeping for organic farms is a real trial.  Why?  Well, they do require that you keep track of things and sometimes it can get annoying when you are not convinced that a particular data point is worth your time to track.

Still, one of the biggest reasons certified organic products are often safer products is because we are required to track product carefully.  If there is a problem with one of our lots of spinach, we should be able to rapidly (in moments) be able to trace that spinach from planting, cultivation, harvest, cleaning, packing and delivery - showing dates, involved workers and enough of the process to determine if there was a problem that needed addressing.

The simple act of keeping those records encourages us to follow safety protocols.  Good enough.

The added bonus is that we are then blessed with data we can use to make decisions about future crops and future processes.  You can't collect data after the event has passed.  But, if you have a system that encourages consistent record-keeping, you will not have to bemoan the loss of important information that you could have used.

And here it is.  The root of it all.

The Genuine Faux Farm uses organic practices and goes through the certification process because it is a key component to how we attain personal satisfaction in our farming.  It is also an important part of how we maintain our own well-being.

I want more fields that I love being in - because those are successful fields.

It is important that we continue to improve from season to season - and the organic certification process supports that goal.

We want healthy soil and a diverse system of organisms on our farm.  Sometimes, we fantasize that the migrating birds and butterflies see our farm as an oasis in a vast desert of corn and soybeans.  Other times, we despair that our little patch is not enough to support them as they pause, exhausted on their way north or south.  But, we still reap rewards when Mr. Bunting sings, the Bull Snake slithers by and Cucumber Frog jumps and startles us.  We see the benefits when green beans taste fantastic and the fresh spinach is heaped on our plates.  

Why do we grow organic?  

We do it for us.

And we do it for nature.

And we do it for you.

Sunday, December 6, 2020

Why Did You Pick That? - Postal History Sunday

It's Postal History Sunday time!

This week, we'll answer another question that has been asked.  It is related to last week's question, but it is much more direct.  I was asked:

"Why do you like to collect postal history from the 1860s, in particular?  What got you started?"

It Started With What I Knew and Understood

I credit my Mom with planting the seeds that led me to where I am in the hobby right now.  Some of my first memories are having her cut or tear some of the prettier stamps off of the incoming mail and giving them to me.  I had a small, pocket sized notebook and I would paste them into the book - drawing around them with crayolas.  I usually did a good job of avoiding coloring ON them.  Some of the first stamps I had in that book were the "Beautification of America" issue of 1969 and the Moon Landing issue of the same year.

Eventually, I learned how stamps were 'supposed' to be collected and I happily participated in the hobby with the extremely limited budget a kid might have for such things.  At the time, it was all about the stamps.  And, at the time, it was mostly about United States stamps for all of the normal reasons.  I had some knowledge of the people, places and events that were on the stamps.  I could read the words on the stamps.  This gave me a lever that allowed me to exercise my curiosity and comfortably expand my knowledge with various trips to the library.

I mean, how many 9-year-olds at the time knew who Sam Rayburn was (Speaker of the House on and off from 1940-1961)?  He was on a stamp (1962 - 4 cents) so I knew of him - but I won't pretend that I fully understood what a "Speaker of the House" was.

I learned about the National Parks because they were depicted on stamps.  In fact, the two stamps shown on the envelope near the top of this post were two on my "maybe someday I'll own one of those expensive stamps" list.

(note: neither of those stamps are actually all that expensive - but to an 8-year-old....)

Curiosity and Awareness

I had a healthy curiosity and interest in learning, so you shouldn't be surprised that I learned what I could about the stamps the United States had issued over the years.  I became aware of some of the earliest stamps.  In fact, even the least expensive 'stamp albums' you could buy for displaying your collection would include a few pictures of some of these stamp issues.  

At the time, I thought they did that just to frustrate the collector with their own inability to actually see those items in person - much less acquire one of them.  At other times, I might have thought that 'perhaps someday' I could find one of those.  But, usually, I knew it was just a pipe dream.

The 2 cent "Black Jack" from 1863 (shown above) was pictured in nearly every album.  The larger than usual image of Andrew Jackson would boldly stare back at you, challenging you to find a copy to put on that spot.  It's an image that became easy for me (and numerous other young collectors) to recognize over time, so you can imagine what it might be like when a kid who has only seen the grainy picture in an album or a catalogue would react when they actually saw one in person!

So - when did I first see a Black Jack in person?  

Tammy's grandfather had an accumulation of stamps from all over the world and I think he was glad that there was another stamp collector looking to join the family.  Sadly, it was not until he had passed away that I dug through a box of old US stamps that had been in his possession and found my first (and second) copies of the Black Jack.  

There he was.  The Black Jack.  Times two.

You Like Them, But How Do You Afford Them?

I was fortunate that I was able to acquire some very early stamps through family, though I must admit that most of the more expensive ones were not the nicest copies (I was NOT complaining).  But, you see, now I was exposed to the artistry of the early engraved stamps.  The fine lattice work on stamps like the 24 cent 1861 issue shown above was amazing - as far as I was concerned.  In fact, I found one of those in the box I talked about as well.  Well... a piece of it was missing.  But, you get the idea.

But, now what?  If I wanted to focus on the early stuff, it would cost money.  Was there a way I could participate without breaking the bank?

To make a long story short, the answer took a while to evolve.  But, I found that you could often acquire a piece of postal history with certain stamps on them that were actually cheaper than the same stamps off of a cover!  Please note that this is NOT always true, but it is often true.  I also became aware that the very earliest US postage stamps seemed to consistently require the most money, but once you got to the 1861 series, things started showing up at prices I could consider.

As my knowledge grew, I found my focus was refined to postal history that featured the 24 cent 1861 stamp.  I liked the color.  I liked the design.  And I very much liked the postal history.

Once I brought what I wanted to collect into focus, it was easier to consider spending more money for one thing instead of spending the same amount for a WHOLE bunch of everything.  So, in a way, focusing the collection was a way to participate and still protect myself from feeling hopeless (I'll never be able to afford that sort of thing) or overspending.  It also gave me ground rules for selling things that did not fit so I had a bit more to spend on the things I wanted.   

And it just so happened that I picked a period in time where the history was rich with complexity and interest - and so was the postal history.  Stamps made their appearance in the 1840s.  Mail was becoming a viable option for persons other than businesses or the elite during the 1850s to 1870s.  All sorts of change - and all kinds of opportunities for me to explore and learn!

Expanding Back Out a Little

As is the case in so many collectible fields, there is expensive and there is "are you kidding me?"  What normally happens to a collector with a fine focus is that they are able to pick up what they can until they reach their limits for price.  At that point, you can either quit altogether, win the lottery, find a way to save up, or you can find another topic area or two.  In my case, I finally found my way to European mail in the 1850s, 60s and 70s.  Things like the item above mailed from France to England in 1864.

I'd like to say I figured it out quickly, but I didn't.  I actually felt a little lost for a time.  I can be forgiven, because my hobby usually goes completely on hold during the growing season (with the exception of postal history blogs - we hope).  So, my progress with these things tends to be focused on winter months (there's another way to control costs!).  But, the logical connection of collecting mail that traveled in the 1860s from the US to other countries (mostly Europe) meant I already had some knowledge to get started.

So once again, it started with what I knew and understood and my curiosity and desire to learn is leading me forward from the edges of what I know to other things.

Thank you for joining me for Postal History Sunday.  Keep the questions coming!  And, I hope you have a fine rest of the weekend and at least a tolerable week!