Welcome to Postal History Sunday, featured weekly on the Genuine Faux Farm blog and the GFF Postal History blog. If you take this link,
you can view every edition of Postal History Sunday, starting with this
one (the most recent always shows up at the top).
If this is your
first time visiting, you are most welcome here! If this is not your
first time visiting, you know what to do already - get a favorite
beverage, put on the fuzzy slippers, set your troubles aside and enjoy.
I attempt to write each Postal History Sunday in a way that is
accessible to people who are both new to postal history and those who
have enjoyed the hobby for some time.
This week, I wanted to share an ongoing project with everyone.
One of the first clues a postal historian has that something different
than usual might have occurred is a date span that is longer than usual
between the entry of the item in the mails and its reported delivery.
This item took 23 days to arrive at the destination post office. Or, at
least, it took that long before it was processed by that location.
This is as much as one week longer than usual, but easily 3-4 days late.
That may not sound like much in the grand scheme of things. Yet it is enough for me to think there is a story here!
This item was mailed in Boston and exhibits an exchange
office transit mark dated September 17. The receiver marking on the
reverse indicates that it arrived at the Rome office on Oct 10,
1867. The envelope has an 1861 design 24-cent stamp and a 3 cent stamp
affixed to the envelope apparently paying the 27 cent rate per 1/4
ounce via the French Mails to Rome.
The Boston mark is a dark
reddish-brown color that could be mistaken as black. It is possible
that the color has changed over time as it has aged, but I don't think
it was ever a bright red. The Boston marking
clearly says that the postage is "paid" but the color to indicate an
item as paid is red, whereas black is supposed to indicate an item is
not paid. The item must have been treated as unpaid or partially paid
as there are two
due amounts on the front. The "27" was apparently recognized as an
error and smudged, then crossed out. The 23 remains for collection at
delivery to Mr. Langdon Williams in Rome.
And here is what I can tell for certain about the route:
-
Boston Sep 17
-
New York Sep 18
- Cunard Line steamship Persia
-
Queenstown (Ireland) Sep 27
- London
- Roma Oct 10
The normal route from London for this item in 1867 would have been via
Marseilles, France, and via ship to Civitavecchia (seaport near Rome). By late 1867, most mail to
Italy other than the Papal State (which included Rome) would have gone via rail with entry at the Modane Tunnel. However, with
tension between Rome and the Kingdom of Italy and the favorable
connections between the Papacy and France, the sea route would have been normal.
So, what's the problem?
For
those of you who are reading and aren't collectors or explorers postal
history on your own, it might seem as if I certainly know enough about
this item already. Even some folks who do work with postal history
might say I've got it pretty well surrounded. But I find this
particular cover to be intriguing and well worth further exploring
because it provides me with an interesting puzzle to work on.
Here are the questions I want to explore:
- Why did this letter take longer than usual to get to where it was going?
- What route did it take from London to Rome?
- Why
did the Roman postal authorities decide that it was not fully paid,
marking the envelope as requiring 23 bajocchi due on delivery?
Each of these questions may be related. If I answer one, I may find that the answer leads to solutions for the other problems.
Let's look at other letters to Rome
I
am going to start with an item that was treated as fully paid by both
the United States and the Papal State postal services. It was also
mailed from Boston, but in the year 1862.
|
1862 cover, Boston to Rome via French Mail at 27 cent per 1/4 ounce rate |
While this item is five years prior to the cover in
question, it still
falls under the same postal arrangements as our first letter. The
Boston exchange
marking is clearly red and clearly the same type of marking as our first
cover. It has the word "paid" under the date, which indicates the item
was to be treated as paid by the
receiving exchange office. The black circular marking is a French
Mail marking and the P.D. in a box also indicates that the item is
paid. The diagonal black line was the
normal method the Roman postal clerks used to indicate that no postage
was due on delivery.
The back of this cover has a single Rome
marking that reads "Roma via di Mare." This tells me the cover traveled
via the Mediterranean Sea to get from Marseilles to Rome. So the route
from London would be:
- Boston April 15
- New York April 16
- Queenstown, Ireland April 27
- London
- Calais, France April 29
- Paris
- Marseilles, France
- Civitavecchia, Papal States
- Rome May 5
The trip took 20 days to reach its completion and it took eight days to get from Queenstown to Rome.
This
is three days fewer than the cover in question. By itself, a three day
difference between two covers is probably not a big deal.
But I do have more comparisons!
This 1865 item shows a Philadelphia exchange office marking, again in
red.
The "18/1" in red pen also indicates that the item was paid and it tells
the French how much of the 27 cents postage was to be sent to them from
the
U.S. The "1" in the "18/1" indicates that the item was weighed a single
rate letter (1/4 ounce or less). Again, this envelope shows French
mail
markings, a PD in box AND the diagonal Roman marking indicating the item
as having no postage due.
This one has a postmark on the back
that reads Civitavecchia via di Mare - once again telling us it went via
ship on the Mediterranean. This letter only took 16 days to get to its
destination in Rome and only SIX days from Queenstown. This difference
can likely be explained by the shipping schedule in Marseille. Mail
ships did not leave daily for Rome, so if an item arrived in Marseilles
in between ship departures, the time would be a bit longer. We just
have to establish that our first letter is longer than normal instead of
this letter being shorter than usual.
And here is another
item treated as paid. This one is a double weight letter mailed
in1862. It only took 19 days from departure in the United to its
arrival in Rome. After looking at several other letters from the US to
Rome, it seems 16 to 20 days would be the normal travel period.
So, how do all of these DIFFER from our first cover?
- All of them have French postal markings
- All of them have the diagonal slash that the Roman post office to show an item as paid
- All of them have a Rome or Civitavecchia marking that reads "via di Mare"
The
last point may or may not be relevant because I have seen other covers
to Rome that have French postal markings, are treated as paid, but have
no marking that read "via di Mare." So, we will discard that fact for
the time being. But maybe I will return to it in the future.
And here is an 1861 cover from Rome coming back the other direction to the United States!
This
letter was prepaid 32 bajocchi, which was the correct amount in 1861
for a letter weighing no more than 6 denari (7.1 grams - a bit under 1/4
gram). This letter took 16 days to get from origin to destination. It
has French postal markings and was treated as paid on arrival in New
York City.
This is where we get a clue that might help us. In
1866, the postage rate from Rome to the US was reduced to 23 bajocchi
from the 32 bajocchi found here. This might explain the mistake in the
rate since the change was fairly recent (about one year). Though you
would think it had been long enough for the postal clerks in Rome to be
familiar with it.
Which reminds me, I should show you our first cover again so you can remember what we're trying to puzzle out.
So what might explain the postal rate question?
At this time, there was no treaty for mail to be directly exchanged
between the United States and the Kingdom of Italy or the Papal States.
Instead, mail to Italy was serviced under postal agreements through
other countries. The French Mails were by far the most common service
utilized to get U.S. letters to Italy at a rate of 27 cents per 1/4 ounce
(7.5 grams). Other
options, such as the Prussian Closed Mail or Hamburg/Bremen mails were
also available.
I think it is safe to say that the "23" is a due
marking for 23 bajocchi, which was the effective rate for mail from Rome
to the United States per 6 denari (7.1 grams). So we will file that
away as a fact for this cover.
The only explanation I have for
the "27" is that the clerk might have been thinking about an older rate
(prior to 1853) that went via Britain. In that case, the mail could
not be paid to destination - it could only be paid to Britain. In my
mind, this is a weak explanation, but it is all I've got.
So, why
did they charge this letter as if it had not been properly paid? There
are two possible explanations. First, they found that the letter was
overweight. Remember, the Romans were probably weighing the letter in
denari and six denari was only 7.1 grams. The French would rate letters
at 7.5 grams and the US at 1/4 ounce (7.08 grams). Is it possible that
the US clerk measured the letter in grams and allowed a letter over 7.1
grams to go at a single rate?
Anyway, if the Roman clerk felt the
letter was overweight, they went ahead and charged only for the
additional unpaid postage of 23 bajocchi.
The second explanation
is that the absence of the expected French markings and a Boston marking
that didn't look as red as they might normally see caused an
inexperienced or overworked clerk treat it as unpaid.
And, of
course, I suppose there are other possible explanations - including the
odd chance that it did not travel through France. But, then I would
expect more markings from German, Swiss or Italian postal services. And
there are none.
So, I think I have the answer to the route
question as well. I believe it went via France, just like the other
letters, but it somehow missed being processed properly by the French
clerks.
Garibaldi and the Attack on Rome
Prior
to 1860, Italy was broken into several different states. By 1867, most
of Italy had been united as the Kingdom of Italy with only the
Patrimony of St Peter, around Rome remaining outside of the Kingdom.
Giuseppe Garibaldi was well known as one of the primary agitators for
the unification of all of Italy and he may figure prominently with
respect to the delay of this letter.
The news of the process of the unification of Italy and, in particular,
the exploits of Garibaldi caught the imaginations of people world-wide.
Below are snippings from the Mercury - the Hobart, Tasmania newspaper of
that time. You may feel free to read the clippings presented or you can wait for the summary below.
Garibaldi was on record as being vehemently against the Papal State and
the Catholic Church calling it the "shame and plague of Italy" at a
congress of European leaders in Geneva earlier in September. He created
a rather overt plan to march on Rome with 10,000 volunteers to coincide
with an insurrection within the city.
These attempts to cause an insurrection and take over Rome failed in
large part because the Kingdom of Italy did not support the effort. In
fact, they arrested Garibaldi himself to prevent his personal leadership
of the "Garibaldians" mentioned in the newspaper.
Of interest here is that the timing of these events would coincide with
the normal delivery period of the piece of mail in question (it finally
arrives on October 10 in Rome). Is it possible that the uproar in and
around Rome delayed the mail? I think it entirely likely that it may
have done so in some fashion. The letter could have been physically
delayed outside the city OR the postal clerks may have been distracted
or prevented from duty. This also brings us to the possibility that the
people who processed this mail were not the normal clerks - which could
explain some mistakes being made.
There is too much, let me sum up
So, let me remind you of the questions first!
- Why did this letter take longer than usual to get to where it was going?
- What route did it take from London to Rome?
- Why
did the Roman postal authorities decide that it was not fully paid,
marking the envelope as requiring 23 bajocchi due on delivery?
It
is my theory that this letter was either delayed in its arrival OR it
sat in the Roman post office waiting for someone to process the mail.
It seems to me that the uproar in Rome and the surrounding territory by
Garibaldi's forces would have been sufficient to create problems for the
timely delivery of mail.
I believe that the letter took the
normal route that the 27 cents in postage paid for via France. Most of
my logic for this is that there is no evidence that it took another
route via German mail options.
And finally, I favor the idea that
the letter was rated as being more than 6 denari (7.1 grams) in weight.
The clerk, possibly inexperienced or under great pressure, opted to
collect the postage for the unpaid second rate level, but recognized
that one rate level was paid. Another explanation runs a close second
for me - and that's the idea that the inexperienced or harried postal
clerk simply didn't see paid markings and figured it must be treated as
unpaid.
---------------
And there you have it. A
puzzle that I continue to make progress on. I shared this with you in
hopes that each of you might have a bit more understanding about the
questions I, as a postal historian, find myself digging into. There is
no requirement that you should want to do this yourself, nor is it
necessary for you to feel as if all of this exploration was interesting
to you at all! Instead, I am hopeful that you found some of it
entertaining - even if the entertaining part was watching a vegetable
and poultry farmer with Computer Science background pretend he can
transport himself back to 1867 and read the minds of postal employees of
the time.
Have a fine remainder of your day and great week to
come! I am grateful for each of you who provides me with encouragement,
feedback and information and I give thanks for all who take the time to
put on the fuzzy slippers and share a few moments of your day reading
Postal History Sunday.